Director’s YouTube Channel

Author Dr. Alexander Unzicker: Converations on Fundemental Physics

Dr. Alexander Unzicker, author, researcher, and journalists will be talking all things physics including science journalism in the modern internet era, what is truly critical thinking, the state of particle physics today, and what is facing today's dissident science community. You won't want to miss the noted author and top critical thinker of our day!

This Saturday: Aether: the Good, Bad, and Ugly - Discussion lead by David de Hilster

The majority of CNPS modelers are aetherists. Yet there are other viable models. What gives??? David de Hilster leads a discussion on a topic much discussed by many critical thinkers.

Physical Reality VS Science Poetry - Open Discussion with David de Hilster

David de Hilster leads an open discussion about how Critical Thinkers often use vocabulary like “Field”, “Energy” and other words without defining them physically.

Live: 2020 Review & 2021 Preview for Critical Thinkers in Science

Host David de Hilster invites all CNPS and Dissident Science Members to discuss the year that was in Scientific Critical Thinking and what our plans should be for 2021.

Infinite Universe Theory - with Dr. Glenn Borchardt

The Infinite Universe Theory presents the ultimate alternative to the Big Bang Theory and the common assumption that the universe had an origin. Author Glenn Borchardt starts with photos of the "elderly" galaxies at the observational edge of the universe. These contradict the current belief that the universe should have increasingly younger objects as we view greater distances. He restates the fundamental assumptions that must underlie the new paradigm. Notably, by assuming infinity he is able to adapt classical mechanics to "neomechanics" and its insistence that phenomena are strictly the result of matter in motion. He shows in detail how misinterpretations of relativity have aided current flights of fancy more in tune with religion than science.Borchardt demonstrates why only Infinite Universe Theory can provide answers to questions untouched by currently regressive physics and cosmogony. His new modification of gravitation theory gets us closer to its physical cause without calling upon attraction or curved spacetime or "immaterial fields.

Saturday: Cosmology & Expansion Tectonics with John Eichler

John will present his worldview of Cosmology and how it relates to the geophysics of Expansion Tectonics. He weaves together the concepts of many famous scientists into an understandable framework based more on laboratory experimentation than abstract theory.

Expansion Tectonics: Fact of Mere Coincidence 2 with Dr. James Maxlow

From the speaker Dr. James Maxlow: "In my earlier podcasts I focused on modelling seafloor and continental crusts in order to create scale models of the ancient Earth extending from the present-day back to the Early Archaean. From this spherical modelling it was concluded that the extensive geological mapping evidence and empirical modelling studies more than adequately demonstrate that an increasing radius Earth is indeed a viable and demonstrable tectonic process. From there I layered modern global observational data onto each of the spherical models in order to test whether or not the data quantify the small Earth modelling. The primary focus of this talk will be to continue layering a selection of modern global observational data utilized in my research studies in order to highlight how this additional data further quantifies Expansion Tectonics. As can be appreciated, until now, this modern data has only been investigated from a conventional Plate Tectonic perspective, and, from this perspective, if the data doesn't fit the theory then it is common practice to propose an adhoc theory to make the data confirm.  With this in mind I must once again emphasize that the research presented here is a data modelling exercise, not a theory modelling exercise, which focuses on modelling modern global observational data independently of any present or pre-existing theory."

LIVE: Book Final Push and Aether Discussion with Bob & David de Hilster

Join Bob and David de Hilster live as they discuss their last push to finish their book "Principia Mathematica 2" as well as their thoughts on aether theories. That should be fun! They will be broadcasting live to YouTube and Facebook. Join them at http://youtube.dissidentscience.com or join them live at http://live.dissidentscience.com

Big Bang or Big Bust with Dr. Glenn Borchardt

Dr. Glenn Borchardt has spent decades revealing the contradictions and paradoxes of the big bang theory. Glenn will be going over a list of falsifying evidence to this problematic theory as well as what he sees as a better alternative. From the age of the universe, to new astronomical observations, to impossible paradoxes - it appears more and more like the big bang is a big bust. Join us as we discuss everything Big Bang with Dr. Glenn Borchardt.

Expansion Tectonics Final: Fact of Mere Coincidence #2? - Dr. James Maxlow

From Dr. James Maxlow: "In my earlier podcasts I focused on modelling seafloor and continental crusts in order to create scale models of the ancient Earth extending from the present-day back to the Early Archaean. From this spherical modelling it was concluded that the extensive geological mapping evidence and empirical modelling studies more than adequately demonstrate that an increasing radius Earth is indeed a viable and demonstrable tectonic process. From there I layered modern global observational data onto each of the spherical models in order to test whether or not the data quantify the small Earth modelling. The primary focus of this talk will be to continue layering a selection of modern global observational data utilized in my research studies in order to highlight how this additional data further quantifies Expansion Tectonics. As can be appreciated, until now, this modern data has only been investigated from a conventional Plate Tectonic perspective, and, from this perspective, if the data doesn't fit the theory then it is common practice to propose an adhoc theory to make the data confirm. With this in mind I must once again emphasize that the research presented here is a data modelling exercise, not a theory modelling exercise, which focuses on modelling modern global observational data independently of any present or pre-existing theory."

 13,737 total views,  20 views today